scottsdale-dui-lawyer

“COPS” it isn’t, but TLC’s upcoming new reality show, “DUI,” reveals what can happen when drivers get behind the wheel after one too many drinks. Or in the case of one teenager, what happens when the police detect the scent of marijuana emanating from the vehicle.

View full post on dui – Yahoo! News Search Results

A man who was victimized in a “dirty DUI” sting operation had his 2009 drunken-driving conviction expunged by an appellate court judge Wednesday. David Dutcher, 49, has waged a legal battle to remove the conviction from…

View full post on dui – Yahoo! News Search Results

Christina Aguilera ‘arrested for public intoxication as boyfriend is taken in for DUI’
Aguilera, 30, was taken to the West Hollywood Sheriff’s station and booked for public intoxication, while her boyfriend, Matthew Rutler, was charged with drink driving.

Read more on Daily Mail

Fla. store offers scooters to those who’ve lost their license to a DUI conviction. Scooter – Motorcycles – Driving under the influence – Recreation – Business

View full post on Yahoo! News Search Results for dui

Saturday, September 25, 2010 Doug Vitello, co-owner of Sunset Scooters in Clearwater, demonstrates an X-Treme XB-600, one of the “DUI scooters” he sells. CLEARWATER — New to the scooter business, Doug Vitello and Gary Parr worked hard to meet their customers’ needs. But there was one type of customer they couldn’t serve. Again and again, they kept hearing: I got a DUI. I lost my license. Do …

View full post on Yahoo! News Search Results for dui

I live in Florida. I got a DUI last spring (April). My attorney is trying to get me out of it, and personally I think, why should he? I was driving under the influence.
This whole thing still hasn’t blown over. What should I do, give me some advice.
I never drink and drive, it was just that one time and of course I got caught.

A 55-year-old man charged with felony DUI — fourth offense or higher — is scheduled to appear in Ark City district court on Nov. 5.

Attorneys for both sides will meet at that hearing to set a date for a preliminary hearing, a court spokeswoman said Thursday.

Eugene Comstock was arrested for driving under the influence of drugs on Sept. 6, and spent the rest of the Labor Day weekend in jail after taking a prescription drug under a doctor’s care, his wife, Carol Comstock told the Traveler in September.

Comstock said he hadn’t touched alcohol in five years and that police treated him unfairly by arresting him. Police contended that Comstock still broke the law by being impaired while driving under the influence of drugs, even if they are prescription drugs.

 

 

   

 

 THANK YOU FOR REQUESTING AND READING THIS INFORMATION.

Bob Keefer

 

: Harrisonburg, Virginia DUI Lawyer. Bob Keefer is a general member in the National College for DUI Defense

.

College members represent the most experienced DUI defense attorneys in the country. The original Founding Members funded the establishment of the college, and are among the top DUI practitioners in the United States. Since its founding, the College continues to recognize, as Sustaining Members, defense lawyers who have demonstrated the skill and experience of the original Founding Members, as well as the generosity to financially sustain the growth of the NCDD. General Members are the backbone of the college—capable, experienced attorneys who dedicate a portion of their practice to the defense of DUI cases throughout the country.

He is co-author of a book on DUI Defense titled, “DUI/DWI Virginia Arrest Survival Guide: The DUI Guilt Myth.” A free E-copy of this book is available on his website or you can call 540-433-6906 and request a copy be mailed to you.

Bob is a certified operator of the Intoxilyzer 5000, the forensic breath alcohol machine used by Virginia. Bob was the first attorney to discover that the Virginia Department of Forensic Science admitted in internal documents that its breath tester was

 

 

“dated, unstable and unreliable.” Bob found that the Department could not find replacement parts. He discovered that the head of the section responsible for maintaining the Intoxilyzer was not even qualified to work on the Intoxilyzers since she had not taken the manufacturer’s technician course

.

Bob has also taken and been certified in the standardized field sobriety test class that the police officers take at the police academy. Not stopping there as most police officers do, Bob took the necessary classes and then received his instructor certification in the

standardized field sobriety testing. Bob has the certifications necessary to teach the officer that arrested you.

Bob can give the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus, the Walk and Turn and the One Leg Stand as they are supposed to be given and assess if your officer failed to give such tests properly.

Call Bob today at 540-433-6906 or email him at

Bob@BobKeeferLaw.com

PART I

By ordering and reading this book you have set yourself apart from the mass of persons accused of DUI who fail to learn the TRUTH

 

 

. Choosing a Virginia DUI Lawyer

is not well liked among lazy lawyers who charge big fees and then plead you guilty without requiring the state to prove its case.

As a wise man once said

 

 

 

:

“You lose 100% of the cases you plead guilty!”

I will tell you a number of essential criteria that a good DUI attorney must have. I will also provide you below with the 8 direct questions to ask every potential DUI attorney. If the attorney hesitates or waffles in his or her answer or tries to tell you these questions are not important you should leave the office or hang up the telephone immediately. Your case and your future are too important to waste time talking to an attorney who will not be direct and honest with you.

I pride myself on being straight with all my clients; if you want a cheerleader who will ignore the facts and the law I am not the attorney for you. My job is not to tell you what you want to hear, but to tell you how things really are!

How to pick a Virginia DUI Attorney – The 8 Questions you must have answered.

1) How many years have you been in practice

 

 

? This will tell you a lot about the attorney’s potential experience. You want an attorney who has been the problems with the Government’s case before and knows how to use those problems to gain your acquittal.

Bob Keefer has been practicing since 1983 and has handled thousands of cases in his career.

 

2) What is the last seminar you attended on DUI defense and when did you attend that seminar?

 

 

DUI defense is not a static profession. New defenses arise all the time and your attorney needs to attend the specialty seminars where such defenses are discussed and explained. Your attorney also needs to belong to a network of DUI defense attorneys to stay current. The Government shares information among prosecutors; your defense attorney should do so as well.

Robert Keefer attends at least two DUI seminars a year and usually attends three. These seminars are given all over the country and involve the expense of airfare, hotel and fees for the seminar. Robert Keefer thinks being as informed as possible of possible defenses for you is worth the investment in time and money.

 

3) Does the attorney even know the name of the Intoxilyzer 5000

 

 

? A lot of people who claim to understand this breath tester do not even know its name. CMI calls it the Intoxilyzer 5000 (68 series). On the federal register it is called the CD/FG5. The 5 is relevant because it indicates the breath tester has five filters. Virginia does not have the 5000EN which is the next breath tester in the series produced by CMI, the breath tester’s manufacturer. If the attorney does not even know the name of the machine he will probably not be able to convince the Court CD/FG5 was not accurate in your case.

4) Do you routinely order the information on the breath tester from DFS?

 

 

The only way to determine if the breath tester was functioning properly is to careful review all of its records. The Attorney ought to already have or be moving quickly to obtain copies of the trouble call log, the analysis log and the maintenance log for the particular breath tester the Government used on you. If he does not then he does not know your machine. If he does not order your particular records, he is not thoroughly evaluating your case.

5) Do you have an Intoxilyzer 5000?

 

 

How can your lawyer adequately represent you when he does not even know the color of the start button?

6) Have you ever been disciplined by the State Bar?

 

 

You do not want a lawyer who has a long disciplinary rap sheet and you deserve to know if your lawyer has been disciplined in the past. If he has been disciplined and you are still interested in retaining him, find out the number of times he was disciplined and the reason for such punishment.

7) What challenges do you see in my case?

 

 

The Attorney should be able to tell you what challenges he sees in the case and what effect such challenges may have on the ultimate outcome.

What will be the final outcome of my case?

 

 

A good attorney will not promise you a specific result because it is impossible to be certain how a case will turn out. Any other answer is dishonest and unethical. A good attorney can only promise to his or her best job in protecting your interests. No lawyer wins all of his or her cases

but it is a certainly that you cannot win an issue your lawyer fails to recognize or fails to raise at trial.

Set out below are some potential defenses to a Virginia DUI. This list is not intended to be exhaustive and such defenses may or may not be available in your case.

POTENTIAL DEFENSES IN VIRGINIA DUI CASE

INVALID STOP

1) The arresting officer did not have “reasonable suspicion” to stop you.

 

 

 

The officer must have reasonable suspicion of a criminal or traffic matter to legally stop a vehicle. If the officer did not have reasonable suspicion then the case should be dismissed for that reason. For example, a partially peeling inspection sticker is not a valid basis for a stop.

2) The basis for the stop was “weaving within the lane.”

 

 

 

Many Virginia lawyers miss this issue entirely. Weaving within the lane is not the same as weaving over the center lane and over the line on the edge of the roadway. Virginia law requires a significant amount of weaving within your lane to justify a stop. With all the large vehicles such as SUVs on the road, could moving a matter of inches in the lane be a reason to stop? You need an attorney who knows this argument has merit.

3) Changing lanes without a signal as a basis for a stop.

 

 

 

Many lawyers believe that merely changing lanes without signaling is an offense. Not true. One is only required to signal if there is other traffic nearby. Most DUI arrests occur late at night and very often the police car is the only vehicle even within sight distance of the driver.

4) Anonymous Tip of possible drunk driver from citizen.

 

 

 

Today almost everyone has a cell phone and more and more suspected drink drivers are being pulled over on the basis of an anonymous 911 call. Virginia law requires that, prior to being legally allowed to stop a car, the officer must obtain sufficient corroborating evidence from the caller to verify the caller’s identification, how the caller obtained the information and what the factual basis is for the caller’s conclusion the suspect is a drunk driver. If the officer does not obtain sufficient corroboration the stop is invalid and the charge must be dismissed.

INVALID ARREST DEFENSES

5) The officer did not have probable cause to make the arrest.

 

 

 

The burden on the officer is greater to arrest you than it is to stop you. The officer must have reasonable suspicion to stop; however, he must have probable cause to arrest. If a motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause to arrest is made the Court considers all facts gathered by the officer before the arrest; what happened after the arrest: the breath or blood test is not relevant.

6) Failure to effectively and persuasively respond to the prosecutor’s argument that the Government’s burden to show a valid arrest is “only” probable cause.

 

 

 

Probable cause is a lesser standard that beyond a reasonable doubt – the standard of proof necessary for the Government to convict. However this is the standard of proof in a civil case; it is not an easy to reach standard like the prosecutors suggest to the Court. The Government must prove from its evidence that it was more likely than not that the accused was driving under the influence.

The Government’s burden to prove probable cause by a preponderance of the evidence is a significant burden to meet and your lawyer should remind the Court of that significant burden.

 

OFFICER’S OBSERVATIONS OF THE ACCUSED

7) Odor or alcohol. Alcohol has no odor

 

 

 

. One cannot tell when someone drank from odor; one cannot tell what someone drank from odor; one cannot tell one cannot tell how much one drank from odor. Your attorney should bring this out on cross examination.

Bloodshot and glassy eyes.

 

 

 

The officer will have to admit that he or she does not know how the Accused’s eyes normally appear. Most lawyers do not know that glassy eyes were never seen as a clue by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of intoxication. Most lawyers also do not know that in a 1997 NHTSA study bloodshot eyes were removed from the list of impairment clues since there were so many other possible causes besides excessive alcohol.

9) Slurred speech.

 

 

 

Again the officer will have to admit that he does not know how the Accused normally sounds. On cross examination the attorney should ask the officer whether he understood what the Accused was saying. Then the officer should be asked whether the Accused was slurring every word or just some words.

FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS

10) Failure to make a blanket objection to all field sobriety tests.

 

 

 

The officer does not know how the Accused would normally perform on these roadside exercises. He is only assuming that any perceived errors were caused by alcohol. Moreover, these “tests” were not designed to detect impairment. Instead, their function is to prognosticate whether someone exceeds the .08 blood alcohol level; nothing more.

11) Failure to object to referring to these as “field sobriety tests” in a jury trial.

 

 

 

This name gives the road side exercises more credibility than they deserve, especially to a jury.

12) The standardized field sobriety tests are inaccurate

 

 

 

. NHTSA approved three tests: Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN), Walk and Turn & One Leg Stand. The Government determined that the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus and the Walk and Turn together were only 80% likely to be correct that the Accused’s BAC was .08 or better. An 80 is not a good grade.

13) Failure to determine if the Accused is an appropriate candidate for these roadside exercises

 

 

 

. HGN has at least 38 causes other than alcohol. Among those are caffeine, cold remedies, nicotine from cigarettes and the flue. A good attorney always checks his clients to determine if they have nystagmus from one of these other causes. Certain eye problems or injuries also make HGN inappropriate. If the Accused is 50 or more pounds overweight, over 60 years old, or has physical impairments that affect their ability to balance, he or she is not an appropriate candidate for these exercises.

14) Failure to point out the location where the exercises were given.

 

 

 

Most of the time these exercises occur on the side of the road. Many such locations are uneven and are covered by debris. NHTSA requires that the Walk and Turn & the One Leg Stand be performed on a smooth, level surface.

15) The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus is not a scientifically valid test under roadside conditions.

 

 

 

When medical doctors conduct this testing they do so in well light areas employing medical equipment that holds the patient’s head still and clearly lists the angles. The officer, for one test, must determine whether he detects the onset of nystagmus prior to 45%. It is almost impossible without be accurate on the angle. The Government should be required to present expert testimony to link nystagmus with BAC levels.

16) The non-standard tests are invalid.

 

 

 

The ABCs, finger touch, nose touch and counting are not valid tests even under the Government’s testing. Your Attorney should object to them.

BREATH AND BLOOD TESTS

17) Failure to object to admissibility of the preliminary breath test (PBT) at a motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause to arrest.

 

 

 

Many lawyers give up because the Virginia Court of Appeals allowed a PBT result to be used in a motion to dismiss. What those lawyers fail to realize is that the PBT has been maintained as required by the PBT’s manufacturer and that the administrative rules have been followed.

18) Failure to obtain maintenance records for the Intoxilyzer 5000.

 

 

 

Machines are not perfect. Machines are not “magic boxes”. All machines break down. Any problems with the breath tester around the time of the Accused’s test could cause the test or even the case to be thrown out.

19) Failure to argue that the BAC at the time of the driving was below .08.

 

 

 

The blood alcohol level is not constant in the Accused. It rises as it is absorbed by the body; it falls as it is processed by the body. Your attorney needs to know how this works so he can show that while the Accused’s BAC might have been .08 or better at the time of testing it was below .08 at the time of driving. Many uneducated attorneys don’t even bother to figure that out. Bob Keefer won a .14 BAC by breath tester case where the Accused had an accident shortly after drinking. The Court, assisted by a Toxicologist hired by Bob Keefer, determined that the Accused’s BAC at the time of driving was .06 at most.

20) Failure to spot multiple issues in the case.

 

 

 

Often the Accused is involved in a single car accident the officer did not observe. In order for the breath or blood test to be admissible the Accused must be arrested within 3 hours of operating the vehicle on a public highway. The Officer may also not have seen the Accused in the driver’s seat so he needs to establish that he was the driver at all. The Officer must also establish that the Accused did not drink after the accident. Something he often cannot do unless the Accused tells him. Often the Accused is taken to a hospital and very often the hospital does not follow the rules to obtain a proper blood sample. Your lawyer needs to explore all of these issues.

I could go on but my point is not to exhaustively list all possible DUI Defenses – that would take thousands and thousands of pages – but instead to point out to you that you need … and deserve competent, educated, thorough counsel to guide you and your defense through the intricate world of DUI Defense

I get tired of watching attorneys take large fees from clients simply to plead them guilty. Many of those clients have winnable cases but the lawyers are either too lazy or too poorly versed in the intricacies of DUI to see the winning argument.

NO LAWYER LOOKS BAD IN HIS OFFICE

 

Most attorneys have no idea that significant problems exist with the breath tester that generates the most important evidence the state will attempt to use against you -– the breath test certificate. Bob does; he owns one.

 

The fact that you have taken the time to request this book shows you are serious about winning your DUI case. I only work with people who want to win their DUI case. I am not the lawyer who “holds” your hand while pleading you guilty.

Ramsell & Associates, LLC has used each and every one of the below items to successfully defend clients against DUI charges over the past 19 years: ILLEGAL STOP OF PERSON OR VEHICLE a driver cannot be stopped unless the officer has a reasonable and articulate basis to believe that a traffic law or other law has been violated. Similarly, a person cannot be seized unless a violation has occurred. WEAVING INSIDE THE LANES IS NOT ILLEGAL weaving without crossing any lines is not a violation of …