State legislators want to ease penalties for some convicted DUI offenders, cutting the time they must use an ignition-interlock system in half and scaling back mandatory jail time.
View full post on dui – Yahoo! News Search Results
State legislators want to ease penalties for some convicted DUI offenders, cutting the time they must use an ignition-interlock system in half and scaling back mandatory jail time.
View full post on dui – Yahoo! News Search Results
Council passes strict DUI penalties on first reading
First-time drunken driving offenders with elevated blood alcohol content (BAC) levels will soon face mandatory jail time if the Laramie City Council continues to vote like it did Tuesday.
Read more on Laramie Boomerang
David Haenel has been practicing law in the State of Florida for nearly a decade.
View full post on dui – Yahoo! News Search Results
KSL 5 News investigates controversial new DUI penalties facing Utah minors
SALT LAKE CITY — Underage drinking is illegal. “They’re under 21. They shouldn’t have been drinking,” says defense attorney Cara Tangaro. Drinking and driving is illegal.
Read more on Deseret News
Colo. lawmakers vote for tougher DUI penalties
DENVER – The Colorado House of Representatives has approved a measure that would crack down on repeat DUI offenders. Under a measure (House Bill 1347) approved Monday on a unanimous vote, drivers who have two or more convictions face a minimum jail term of 60 days in jail and two years of probation. The bill now goes to the Senate.
Read more on Vail Daily
Would this be considered a 2nd offense? Or 1st offense since the 1st DUI didn’t occur in California?
Thanks for your answers. Just to clarify, I’m not asking for myself – I’m asking for my sister who has received 1 dui in another state and is now living in CA. She has not received one in CA, but I’m planning on talking to her about her drinking problem and wanted to bring up what the consequences would be if she did receive another while in CA.
Driving under the influence of alcohol is an undeniable problem across the world. Many preventive measures are taken to discourage the act, but massive penalties are used by every state as a deterrent. The question is do they work?
There are two forms of drunk driving from a legal perspective, but really just one form if you think the process through. The two types are DUI and DWI. DUI refers to driving with a blood alcohol content of .08 percent or higher. This is known as driving drunk per se. A DWI, in contrast, does not require the .08 percent figure. You can be driving with blood alcohol content of .05, but still be charged for driving while impaired if the officer in question believes your driving was impacted. In truth, but really boil down to whether your ability to control a car and make decisions is impacted.
A host of preventative efforts are made to deter drunk driving. They range from public information commercials, the broadcasting of horror stories from crashes and the very public display of police check points. Logically, all make sense as deterrents, but there is one problem. By definition, a person that has been tossing down adult beverages all night is not making logical decisions. State governments use the concept of fear to address this issue.
Fear is a great motivator. It is one of our base emotional states. State governments know this and they tie it into drunk driving deterrents by running up the penalties. If you are convicted for a DUI, you face a host of nightmarish penalties. First, you are going to pay big dollars for an attorney, then you are going to pay fines and perhaps the cost of counseling. Depending on the state, you may well end up sitting in jail for a month to a year. That means losing your job and probably going bankrupt since you will not be able to pay bills. I’m not even going to mention what car insurance is going to end up costing you!
So, do these penalties actually work? All indications are they do. Over 26,000 people died in 1982 due to alcohol-related accidents. This accounted for roughly 60 percent of all deaths in traffic accidents. 25 years later, “only” a bit over 15,000 people were killed in alcohol-related deaths, roughly 37 percent of all traffic accident deaths. The 15,000 figure is all the more encouraging when you figure in the fact the population grew dramatically during this period.
Drunk driving will never be eliminated unless we revisit the idea of Prohibition. Nobody wants to do that, so severe penalties will have to be the major deterrent.
Dirk Gibson writes about drinking and driving facts for the aftermarket car parts site – DCJAutoParts.com.
The Law Offices of Finebloom & Haenel, PA www.fightyourdui.com The Law Offices of Finebloom & Haenel, PA is a DUI defense law firm servicing clients on the West Coast of Florida. As experienced DUI attorneys, we have helped countless clients contest their DUI charges and sentences. At Finebloom & Haenel, our attorneys understand Florida DUI law. We use our knowledge to defend our DUI clients to the fullest extent possible in Florida. Our firm has former prosecutors and public defenders who …